ConstitutionNEXT
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact
Search

Kamala  Harris  Proposal  Threatens  10th  Amendment  Federal/State  Balance

6/5/2019

 
Kamala Harris made news this past week by proposing that state laws restricting abortions be subject to preclearance by the U.S. Justice Department.  The proposal is modeled after the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 which forced state and counties with a history of discrimination to get preclearance from the federal government to make changes in their election procedures.  The Feds blocked 86 measures in several states under voting rights preclearance.  Preclearance for abortion restrictions could have just as big an impact - abortion restrictions have been enacted in ten states so far this year. 

In 2013, the Supreme Court knocked down part of the voting rights preclearance scheme.  The Court found that the formula used to determine whether states were still discriminating against minority voters were out of date and the Justice Department was acting like nothing had changed in the last 50 years when it clearly had.  As applied, preclearance had become unconstitutional, violating the Tenth Amendment.  [Shelby County v. Holder, 2013]  “The Tenth Amendment reserves to the States all powers not specifically granted to the Federal Government, including ‘the power to regulate elections.’” Id.  The Court found that the federal government could not disrupt the “equal sovereignty” of the states - that is, treat them differently from each other - on the basis of out-of-date information. [more here]

But here’s the rub: the Supreme Court did not say preclearance itself is unconstitutional or against the Tenth Amendment.  Instead, it said Congress can mandate preclearance under “exceptional conditions”.  Literacy tests and poll taxes were the “exceptional conditions” justifying preclearance in the voting rights context.

The analysis in the abortion context is different, and is of no comfort to friends of limited government.  States have the power to regulate elections, but the Supreme Court declared a federal fundamental right to abortion in the Roe v. Wade case.  The Court federalized the abortion issue and didn’t leave much in the way of state power on the issue.  States can try, even citing health and safety concerns, but state restrictions on abortion can get knocked down if they are deemed an “undue burden” on the federal fundamental right to abortion.  This has been the basic set-up since the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision in 1992.

We may not like it but, because of the way constitutional law has gone in this country, a President Kamala Harris would have at least as strong a case in asking Congress to enact preclearance in the abortion context as there was in the voting rights context.  She can cite all the recent attempts to restrict abortions, claim that the heartbeat and other types of bills are “undue burdens” on the right to abortions, and say to Congress “exceptional conditions” exist to justify preclearance and require affected states to come begging to Washington before their legislatures can even take up any abortion bills at all.  She’s not crazy, and that’s a problem for friends of the Tenth Amendment and limited government.

Comments are closed.

    The Web Team

    Our web team is dedicated to bringing you Constitutional news you can use.

    Archives

    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    November 2023
    June 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018

    Categories

    All
    Constitution Minute
    Contributed Articles
    News Round Up
    News Round-Up

    RSS Feed

Home

Blog

Resources

Contact

Dedicated to protecting freedom for all Americans, present and future.
Photo from Fibonacci Blue
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact