ConstitutionNEXT
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact
Search

Indiana  Supreme  Court  Lays  Down  a  Marker  in  Asset  Forfeiture  Reform

11/13/2019

 
In February, I told you about a Supreme Court case where the state of Indiana moved for the civil asset forfeiture of a drug dealer’s $42,000 Land Rover SUV.  The drug dealer bought the SUV, not with drug money, but with the proceeds of a life insurance policy on his father who had passed away. The $42,000 purchase price was roughly four times the maximum allowable fine for the offense.  The Supreme Court found the forfeiture disproportionate to the crime and sent the case back to the Indiana Supreme Court to reconsider the matter in light of the 8th Amendment’s prohibition against excessive fines.  The Supreme Court applied the Excessive Fines Clause to the states for the very first time in this case through the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment.
 
At the end of October, the Indiana Supreme Court rejected the prosecution’s argument that any property used in a crime is subject to seizure.  Instead, the court ruled a number of factors must be taken into account in deciding whether a forfeiture is ‘excessive’ within the meaning of the 8th Amendment.  The factors include the owner’s guilt and the extent of the misconduct, but also the owner’s financial circumstances.   The court wrote it would be fictitious to believe that “taking away the same piece of property from a billionaire and from someone who owns nothing else punishes each person equally.”  The case now goes back to the trial court for a final determination, after applying the new standard to the facts at hand.  The trial court had originally ruled in the drug dealer’s favor in 2015 and ordered the SUV returned to him. 
 
This case is not the end of the civil asset forfeiture issue.  Several legislative reforms have been proposed to curb civil asset forfeiture abuse.  These reforms include:

  • Sending forfeiture money to the general fund to remove the incentive for law enforcement to enrich itself through excessive forfeiture
  • Restoring the presumption of innocence by requiring the government to prove the owner knew about the illegal use of the property (this is in effect in 16 states and the District of Columbia),
  • Not allowing local law enforcement to work with the feds to bypass state restrictions and seize the property (now prohibited in 8 jurisdictions), and
  • Even abolishing civil asset forfeiture altogether as in New Mexico, North Carolina, and Nebraska.  In those states, property can be taken only after the owner is convicted of a crime.

Bills in Congress would, among other things:
  • Raise the burden of proof in civil forfeiture proceedings from a ‘preponderance’ of the evidence to ‘clear and convincing’ evidence
  • Guarantee legal representation in forfeiture proceedings, and
  • Abolish the federal program that lets local law enforcement evade state forfeiture restrictions.

With more actions expected in the courts, state legislatures, and Congress, the final contours of civil asset forfeiture law and, thus, the practical meaning of the 8th Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause will not be known for some time.

Comments are closed.

    The Web Team

    Our web team is dedicated to bringing you Constitutional news you can use.

    Archives

    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    November 2023
    June 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018

    Categories

    All
    Constitution Minute
    Contributed Articles
    News Round Up
    News Round-Up

    RSS Feed

Home

Blog

Resources

Contact

Dedicated to protecting freedom for all Americans, present and future.
Photo from Fibonacci Blue
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact