ConstitutionNEXT
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact
Search

Can  California  Keep  Trump  Off  the  Ballot  over  Tax  Returns?

8/21/2019

 
Suppose it’s the year 2011 and Texas passes a law no presidential candidate can appear on the ballot unless the candidate releases their college records to the public.  You might recall that President Obama refused to release his records from Columbia University.  What do you think would have happened if Texas had passed such a law?  The Obama campaign would have screamed the law was unconstitutional, Republicans in Texas would have countered that the law promoted transparency, and the Supreme Court would have ruled in Obama’s favor, if my analysis is correct. 

California recently enacted a law requiring presidential and gubernatorial candidates to release five years of tax returns before being allowed to appear on a primary ballot. President Trump and the RNC sued California earlier this month to block the law. 

It seems pretty cut and dried to me - Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution lays out the qualifications for President.  It talks about the President having to be a natural born citizen and at least 35 years old.  California - or any other state, for that matter - cannot add extra qualifications like releasing tax returns before someone can be President.  That is, indeed, one of the arguments made in the lawsuits.  The Supreme Court ruled in 1995 that states could not add term limits to the qualifications for members of Congress.  Moreover, the Supreme Court has not looked with favor on states trying to add restrictions in a nation-wide electoral process.

The lawsuits go on to argue that the California law violates the First Amendment for targeting President Trump for his political views, violates the 14th Amendment, and is preempted by the federal statute requiring candidates to file financial disclosure forms.

So are the law professors and others who support California’s law completely crazy?  Well, maybe not completely.  They argue, first, that states can impose some requirements, like a signature-gathering process for independent candidates in federal elections.  But when Ohio tried to impose an early filing deadline on independent candidate John Anderson in 1980, it got shot down.  Next, it is argued that California’s law merely gives voters information they care about and applies equally to all candidates.  Third, some say California’s law only affects party primaries, not the national election.  But the Supreme Court extended constitutional protections to primaries in 1941 [United States v. Classic].  Finally - and this is really exotic - it’s been argued that Presidents are not elected by popular vote and states have wide discretion to set requirements for who may serve as electors in the Electoral College.  Therefore, it is argued, there is nothing wrong with requiring that electors only pledge support to candidates who have released their tax returns.

All of this is too clever by half.  It’s dangerous to make predictions, especially about the future, but I’ll go out on a limb and predict the judicial branch will ultimately find California’s law adds extra qualifications to the office of President and is, therefore, unconstitutional.  The stakes are high because same law has been proposed in at least 25 states.  If California’s law is upheld, Trump could be off the 2020 ballot in half the country.  Stay tuned on this one.

Comments are closed.

    The Web Team

    Our web team is dedicated to bringing you Constitutional news you can use.

    Archives

    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    November 2023
    June 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018

    Categories

    All
    Constitution Minute
    Contributed Articles
    News Round Up
    News Round-Up

    RSS Feed

Home

Blog

Resources

Contact

Dedicated to protecting freedom for all Americans, present and future.
Photo from Fibonacci Blue
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact