ConstitutionNEXT
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact
Search

7th  Circuit  Upholds  the  Use  of  ShotSpotter  Technology

3/25/2020

 
One hundred police departments use the ShotSpotter sensor system to triangulate the location of gunfire and send patrol cars to the scene.  In a case of first impression out of Illinois, the 7th Circuit held that the use of ShotSpotter can be permissible under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  [United States v. Terrill A. Rickmon, Sr. (7th Circuit - March 11, 2020)]

The court started its analysis by referring to well-established Terry stops which have long been held constitutional if based on “reasonable suspicion”.  The “reasonable suspicion” test, which is less stringent than the probable cause needed to support a warrant, is met when articulable facts suggest criminal activity, based on the totality of circumstances known to the officer at the time of the stop.

In the Illinois case, ShotSpotter alerted a system representative in California, a live person who determined the sound to be gunshots.  The information was relayed back through the system to a patrol officer who stopped a car leaving the area where the gunfire was heard.  With the driver’s consent, the officer searched the vehicle and found a gun underneath the passenger seat where the defendant was sitting.  The defendant had a criminal history and was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon.

The court wrote that the ShotSpotter alert was not enough by itself to justify stopping a vehicle, but went on to find the stop was reasonable based on the totality of the circumstances.  The court analogized the ShotSpotter alert to an anonymous tip, which must be corroborated to pass constitutional muster.  The corroboration in this case consisted of independent reports of cars and an individual on foot leaving the scene.  Another circumstance was the dangerousness of the crime - here, gunfire, making this an emergency situation.   Also, it was 4:45 a.m. and the officer found no other traffic on the street.  This was the only car the officer saw coming from the scene.   Finally, this officer had previously been called to several shootings in the same area of the city.  Add it all up and the totality of the circumstances suggests the people in this vehicle were involved in criminal activity.

There was a dissent that found all of this rather thin.  The officer had no information about this particular car and admitted he would have stopped any car leaving the scene.  Thus, in the dissent’s view, there was no individualized reason to support the stop.  “If  the  Fourth  Amendment  stands for anything, it stands for the proposition that the police  cannot  seize  anyone  without  adequate,  individualized  reason to do so,” the dissent wrote.

Factual circumstances aside, the point for tonight’s purposes is that the Fourth Amendment has been applied to another new technology and the use of that technology has been upheld by a federal appeals court.   A marker has been laid down and future cases will probably turn on fine shadings of fact.  It would be an uphill climb at this point to get ShotSpotter disqualified as unconstitutional in all cases.


Comments are closed.

    The Web Team

    Our web team is dedicated to bringing you Constitutional news you can use.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018

    Categories

    All
    Constitution Minute
    Contributed Articles
    News Round Up
    News Round-Up

    RSS Feed

Home

Blog

Resources

Contact

Dedicated to protecting freedom for all Americans, present and future.
Photo used under Creative Commons from Fibonacci Blue
  • Welcome
  • Videos
    • Archives
  • Blog
  • Your Rights
  • Resources
    • Resources By Age-Group
    • Teacher Resources
    • Competitions
    • Opportunities for Young Americans
  • Bill of Rights
  • Contact